116 Wash. 2d 929 - Schrempp v. Munro’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably State v. Bourgeois (1997), 122 Wash. 2d 648 - King County v. Washington State Boundary Review Board (1993)
1 federal appellate · 51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall · 113 Wash. 2d 929 - Forbes v. City of Seattle · 111 Wash. 2d 828 - Kreidler v. Eikenberry · 106 Wash. 2d 269 - In Re the Estate of Little · United American Life Insurance Co. v. Zions First National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statute provides that the Secretary of State may refuse to file a petition if it is not in the form required by the statute. The statute sets out a form of petition and requires that the petition be substantially in that form. Inherent in the decision of the Secretary of State to accept and file this petition was his determination that the petition was substantially in the form required.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[d]espite the unavailability of either direct or discretionary review, we may, in unusual circumstances, exercise our inherent power ... to determine if the trial court's decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`willful and unreasoning action, without consideration and in disregard of facts or circumstances'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.