116 Wash. App. 536 - State v. Crabtree’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 108 Wash. 2d 125 - State v. Pascal · State v. Sledge · 23 Wash. App. 789 - State v. Strong · 54 Wash. App. 81 - State v. Tauala · State v. Beaver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f there were really an appropriate treatment program to send him to in the system, you know, I think I would do it.... [B]ut I just think that there are really, real significant problems ... in providing the kind of treatment in many areas for juveniles, and this is one. ... I really am concerned that not only would that not be available to him if I send him to a regular institution. I am really quite afraid that it will make the problem worse. And in this case, making the problem worse really affects, I think, public safety issues in the long run.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crabtree“RCW 13.40.230(2)(b); State v. B.E.W., 65 Wash. App. 370, 375 , 828 P.2d 87 (1992). And, again, the court's discretion will be overturned only upon a showing of manifest abuse of discretion. State v. P., 37 Wash. App. 773, 779 , 686 P.2d 488 (1984); State v. Strong, 23 Wash.App. 789, 794 , 599 P.2d 20 (1979). The court was aware that Tristan had previously been reported as having chemical dependency issues. The chemical dependency alternative is a flexible program. The court's idea here was to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crabtree“The court found a manifest injustice precisely because the prior convictions were valid, the criminal history was properly calculated, and the deferred disposition and expungement provisions were accordingly not available. And the manifest injustice option provided him the discretion to depart from the guidelines. Other factors such as parental involvement and effectiveness, the juvenile's improvement in school, and his participation in treatment may not be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crabtree
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.