State v. Applin’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 577 - State v. Rice · 98 Wash. 2d 789 - State v. Crenshaw · 112 Wash. 2d 347 - State v. Neher · People v. . Schmidt · People v. Schmidt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the [l]egislature has chosen to codify the M'Naghten test in statutory form, it would be preferable to have this test presented to the jury without any elaboration. This would permit both parties to argue their theories of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he law is, for the most part, an expression of collective morality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.