116 Wash. App. 851 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “operation testified. Although there were some inconsistencies in the details of the officers' testimony, they corroborated the basic facts of Pioli's account: that Pioli first made contact with Toliver, then with Johnson, and the three walked to the 611 Tavern where Pioli engaged in a transaction with Hubert. Johnson did not testify. The defense presented the testimony of Hubert who said that he walked out of the tavern and either Johnson or Toliver, he could not remember which one, asked where they could get”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson

2. “Pioli up. [6] Pioli broke off another piece of the cocaine, gave it to Johnson and the two separated. Several minutes later, Johnson, Toliver, and Hubert were arrested. In a search incident to arrest, the police found a crack pipe in Johnson's pocket. The pipe contained cocaine residue. [7] Johnson, Hubert and Toliver were charged with delivery of cocaine. The Information alleged that on September 18, 1997, they”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson

3. “[5] Hubert walked back into the tavern. Johnson told Pioli where he should stand. Hubert came out with rock cocaine and walked up to Pioli. In exchange for the cocaine, Pioli gave Hubert prerecorded money. After the exchange, Toliver reminded Pioli that he had promised him a chip of the cocaine for his assistance. Pioli broke off a piece of cocaine and gave it to him. Pioli then gave the prearranged”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson