Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Wash. App. 876 - Edelman v. State

116 Wash. App. 876 - Edelman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 118 Wash. 2d 801 - Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley · Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission · 127 Wash. 2d 759 - Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review Board · American National Fire Insurance Co. v. B & L Trucking and Construction Co. · 93 Wash. 2d 368 - Fahn v. Cowlitz County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Two or more entities are treated as a single entity if one of the two or more entities is a subsidiary, branch, or department of a corporation or a local unit, branch, or affiliate of a trade association, labor union, or collective bargaining association. All contributions made by a person or political committee whose contribution or expenditure activity is financed, maintained, or controlled by a trade association, labor union, collective bargaining organization, or the local unit of a trade association, labor union, or collective bargaining organization are considered made by the same person or entity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If two or more entities are affiliated pursuant to WAC 390-16-309(1), the parent corporation, national or international labor union or state body of such national or international labor union, trade association or state body of such trade association, national or state collective bargaining organization or national or state membership organization (hereinafter called the parent or umbrella organization) automatically shares a single contribution limit with each of its subsidiary corporations, corporate branches or departments or with each of its local units.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “into RCW 42.17.660(2), to modify the large organizations listed in the first sentence, as follows: Two or more entities are treated as a single entity if one of the two or more entities is a subsidiary, branch, or department of a [ contributing ] corporation or a local unit, branch, or affiliate of a [ contributing ] trade association, labor union, or collective bargaining association. RCW 42.17.660(2) (emphasis added to illustrate how WAC 390-16-311 alters RCW 42.17.660(2)). This”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.