Dickinson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 1967
2 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullan v. State · Burritt v. Commissioners of State Contracts · May v. Rice · Tipton v. Parker · Reynolds v. Blue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the instant case the Legislature attempted to do by concurrent resolution that which they had no power to do, but which they did have the power to do by an act, as was done In re Duvis, 49 Pac. 160 (Kan.).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russell v. Cone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.