Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 CAL 1 - Barnes v. Glide

Barnes v. Glide’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
6
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F. (1904), 24 Cal. 2d 720 - W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment Commission (1944)

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

1801897190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Freehill v. Chamberlain · Bates v. Gregory · People ex rel. Olmsted v. Board of Supervisors

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the action of mandamus cannot be maintained until there has been a refusal to perform the official duty sought to be enforced is true, but to hold that a plaintiff, who has a right to demand performance at any time, may delay such demand indefinitely, would enable him to defeat the object and purpose of the statute. It is certainly not the policy of the law to permit a party, against whom the statute runs, to defeat its operation, by neglecting to do an act which devolves upon him, in order to perfect his remedy against another. If this were so, a party would have it in his own power to defeat the purpose of the statute in all cases of this character. He could neglect to claim that to which he is entitled, for even fifty years unaffected by the statute of limitations, thereby rendering it a dead letter. In such a construction of the statute we cannot concur.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.