Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 CAL 425 - Wassermann v. Sloss

Wassermann v. Sloss’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
9
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Smith v. Bach (1920), Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co. (1947)

33 state decisions

701897190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnston v. Russell · Tyler v. Carlisle · Morgan v. Groff · Adams Express Co. v. Reno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As long as money deposited with an agent for an illegal purpose remains unemployed, or if the. purpose be countermanded 'by the principal before its application, it is a debt which may be recovered from the agent by the principal, either at law or in equity.” (Page 529.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Seeing the error of his ways, the law says a party may withdraw from the transaction; and it extends to him a helping hand by offering the inducement of giving back to him anything of value with which he has parted.” (Wassermann v. Sloss, supra, p. 428.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.