Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 CALAPP2D 688 - Potter v. Boisvert

Potter v. Boisvert’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2013

8 state decisions

401953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 16 Cal. App. 59 - Allstead v. Laumeister · Xydias v. Adamson · Taylor v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is settled in California that whenever a party ■who, as actor, seeks to set judicial machinery in motion and "obtain some remedy, has violated conscience, good faith or other equitable principle in his prior conduct, then the doors of the court will be shut against him in limine-, the court will refuse to interfere on his behalf to acknowledge his right, or to afford him any remedy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.