Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Colo. 256 - Parrish v. De Remer

Parrish v. De Remer’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 1986 · most notably Abrahamsen v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1972), Hamm v. Thompson (1960)

2 federal appellate · 14 district · 28 state decisions

20019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on George Fuller Co v. Otis Elevator Co · Otis Elevator Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. · Hatfield v. Barnes · Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. Western Light & Power Co. · Parrish v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One who has been charged with negligence as to another, and for which judgment has been entered and paid, may maintain an action against a joint tort-feasor for indemnification * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * sole, primary and proximate cause of the injury * * *,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.