Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 F. 1006

Docket No. 1,158.

Maddox v. Cornell

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1902.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1902-10-21

<p>Petition to Review Proceedings in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia.</p>

4 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1902-10-21

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United: States for the Northern District of Georgia.

¶2P. H. -Brewster, Arthur Hey-man, and R. T. Dorsey, for appellant.

¶3John M. Slaton, Benj. Z. Phillips, and. J. D. Kilpatrick, for appellees.

¶4Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6As the record shows that the appellant H. E. Maddox, denies that he is, or was at the time bankruptcy proceedings were instituted, a partner in the firm of W. E. Small & Co., and as said H. E. Maddox was. not adjudicated a bankrupt, and the judgment adjudicating W. E. Small &. Co. and W. E. Small and J. S. Jones individually, was made without prejudice in any way whatever to the rights of H. E. Maddox to be heard hereafter upon any question involving his responsibilities as an alleged member of the firm of W. E. Small & Co., the said H. E. Maddox has no appealable interest therein, and this appeal is dismissed.

/117/f1d/1006 · .json · Public domain