In re Sears’s Empirical Analysis
117 F. 294 · 1902
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
December 1918
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Sears
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Kxoept for that provision, such mi amendment would have been permissible, and its allowance a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion; but the provision. by implication, limits tlie power of amendment to the single case in whieh an earlier act of bankruptcy is sought to be incorporated into the petition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The order allowing an amendment of the petition by the insertion of a special act of bankruptcy was erroneous, because it clearly appeared that such act of bankruptcy was not an earlier act than that first, alleged, but was later.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilder v. Watts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.