Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 F.1d 294 - In re Sears

In re Sears’s Empirical Analysis

117 F. 294 · 1902

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
December 1918
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In re Sears

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Kxoept for that provision, such mi amendment would have been permissible, and its allowance a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion; but the provision. by implication, limits tlie power of amendment to the single case in whieh an earlier act of bankruptcy is sought to be incorporated into the petition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The order allowing an amendment of the petition by the insertion of a special act of bankruptcy was erroneous, because it clearly appeared that such act of bankruptcy was not an earlier act than that first, alleged, but was later.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.