Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 F.2d 154 - Holliday v. Wade

Holliday v. Wade’s Empirical Analysis

117 F.2d 154 · 1941

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2018

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

3019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Georgia Casualty Co. v. O'Donnell · Adams v. Maryland Casualty Co. · Hemphill Et Ux. v. Nelson · Wear v. City of Mulberry · Day v. Benesh Et Ux.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assume the duty the Supreme Court of Florida would have if the case were before it, to state the proper interpretation of the amended statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.