Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 F.2d 612 - In re Lovich

In re Lovich’s Empirical Analysis

117 F.2d 612 · 1941

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Walker v. Citizens State Bank (1984), La Trattoria, Inc. v. Lansford (1987)

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

13019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morimura, Arai & Co. v. Taback · In re Slocum · Willoughby v. Jamison · Hardie v. Swafford Bros. Dry Goods Co. · In re Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We believe that the circumstances under which Boris Lovich made the statement would justify the application of this principle, [that a false statement made recklessly without any attempt to ascertain the facts and without any basis for an honest belief or truth may bar a discharge under section 14, subd. C(3), the former ‘false financial statement’ exception to discharge]; nevertheless it does not follow as of course that his conduct will bar the discharge of his employers, the bankrupts. As their authorized agent to manage the business, fraud on his part in obtaining credit for them may be imputed to them to affect their rights and obligations with respect to the person defrauded without necessarily affecting their privilege of a discharge under the Bankruptcy Act.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] discharge is a privilege accorded to bankrupts by the statute unless they are chargeable with conduct showing some lack of personal business morality”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.