Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 F.3d 1353 - Cutcliffe v. Cochran

Cutcliffe v. Cochran’s Empirical Analysis

117 F.3d 1353 · 1997

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Lewis v. Cowen (1999), Randall v. Scott (2010)

11 federal appellate ·

1001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Perry v. Sindermann · Connick v. Myers · Elrod v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is implied that the way to revisit Terry is through this case. I respectfully disagree. Judge Kravitch, in her special concurrence, expressly takes no position on this question. There are several reasons for my disagreement. First, I think Terry v. Cook was correctly decided. Second, Branti was a pure political affiliation case (although, as noted, Justice Stewart dissented in Branti because he viewed Assistant Public Defenders as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a newly elected or appointed sheriff assumes office, the incoming sheriff may not terminate the employment of any deputy sheriff covered by ss. 30.071-30.079 for lawful off-duty political activity or for a discriminatory reason. The incoming sheriff may replace deputy sheriffs assigned to managerial, confidential, or policymaking positions or part-time deputy sheriffs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “personal loyalty to the sheriff is an ap•propriate requirement for the effective performance of a deputy sheriff. And if a sheriff may hire and fire deputy sheriffs on the employees’ political patronage, we conclude a sheriff may promote and demote on this basis also.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.