Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 F.3d 239

Docket No. 93-5376.

Brown v. Bryan County

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-07-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2000

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“for consideration in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Brown v. Bryan County

Relies on Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown · Brown v. Bryan County

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-07-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John Kermit Hill, Duke Weldon Walker, Mill, Ellis & Walker, Sherman, TX, for Jill Brown.

Wallace B. Jefferson, Sharon E. Callaway, Crofts, Callaway & Jefferson, San Antonio, TX, Jack Gordon Kennedy, Kennedy, Minshew, Campbell & Morris, Sherman, TX, for Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Paul N. Brown, Judge.

Prior report: --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1382, 137 L.Ed.2d 626.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER:

¶1

The above case, which can be found at 67 F.3d 1174 was reversed by the Supreme Court. Our judgment was vacated and the same was remanded. We in turn remand the same to the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, from whence it came, for consideration in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

/117/f3d/239 · .json · Public domain