Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 F.3d 368 - Gilmour v. Rogerson

Gilmour v. Rogerson’s Empirical Analysis

117 F.3d 368 · 1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2018

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Morissette v. United States · Hamling v. United States · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Dombrowski v. Pfister

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]ot only is the [government’s] interest in banning the sexual exploitation of children very strong, but the mistake-of-age defense is directly contrary to that interest.... [T]he defense will typically be proved by evidence that the minor was a willing, perhaps deceitful participant in producing pornographic films and photos. The [government] may legitimately protect children from self-destructive decisions reflecting the youthful poor judgment that makes them, in the eyes of the law, beneath the age of consent. One can argue that sexually sophisticated [adolescents] do not need or even do not deserve such protection, but that is a legislative question.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It shall be unlawful to employ, use, persuade, induce, entice, coerce, solicit, knowingly permit, or otherwise cause or attempt to cause a minor to engage in a prohibited sexual act or the simulation of a prohibited sexual act. A person must know, or have reason to know, or intend that the act or simulated act may be photographed, filmed, or otherwise preserved in a negative, slide, book, magazine, computer, computer disk, or other print or visual medium ... or in any other type of storage system.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.