Innovative Health Systems Inc 1-3 v. City of White Plains Sj’s Empirical Analysis
117 F.3d 37 · 1997
Citation profile
60 federal appellate · 35 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 183 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc. (2001), Henrietta v. Bloomberg (2003)
60 federal appellate · 35 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Warth v. Seldin · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood · Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 183 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he language of Title II's antidiscrimination provision does not limit the ADA's coverage to conduct that occurs in the `programs, services, or activities,' of [a public entity]. Rather, it is a catch-all phrase that prohibits all discrimination by a public entity, regardless of the context.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[N]o qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance....”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.