United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
117 F.3d 417 · 1997
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Comito (1999), United States v. Hall (2005)
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1294
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Manning · United States v. Frazier · United States v. Stephenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The District Court's construction or interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence is a question of law subject to de novo review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Moreover, to warrant relief [under the Due Process Clause, a party] must show that he was prejudiced by the trial court's error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,” the revocation proceedings can not be equated to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.