Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 F.3d 965 - Smith v. Sushka

Smith v. Sushka’s Empirical Analysis

117 F.3d 965 · 1997

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably McCormick v. Braverman (2006), Duane Jantzen v. Lewis Hawkins Canadian County Board of County Commissioners (1999)

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

2901997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Branti v. Finkel · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure to raise an affirmative defense by responsive pleading does not always result in waiver. The purpose of Rule 8(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is to give the opposing party notice of the affirmative defense and a chance to respond.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[P]olitical affiliation is not limited to membership in a political party and includes commonality of political purpose and support of political candidacy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[f]ailure to raise an affirmative defense by responsive pleading does not always result in waiver.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.