Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 F. App'x 260

Allen v. Iveys

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-12-20

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2005

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Tawana S. Alen appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allen v. Iveys, No. CA-04-309-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED

/117/fappx/260 · .json · Public domain