117 F. App'x 779 - Smith v. Greiner’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2020
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Zafiro v. United States · Sellan v. Kuhlman · People v. Sandoval
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the standard for evaluating whether there has been a constitutional error resulting from an evidentiary error is whether such error was 'so pervasive as to have denied [the defendant] a fundamentally fair trial,’ ” and that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Fischer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.