117 Ind. App. 623 - Getto v. Getto’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 78 Ind. App. 275 - Thomas v. Hennes · 97 Ind. App. 592 - Humphrey v. Pleasure Park Company · 100 Ind. App. 257 - Gray v. James · 112 Ind. App. 179 - Sodders v. Jackson · Alford v. Reid
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There can be no doubt as to what is meant . by a.‘condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form so as to present the substance clearly and concisely,’ nor can there be any doubt that the purpose intended to be subserved by this rule is to present the substance of the evidence as given at the trial, in a connected form and as concisely as possible. We do not think there has been such a compliance with the rule in this case as entitles appellant to a review of the question that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the verdict.” (Our italics.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.