¶1The writings between the husband and a third person were not conclusive against the wife. The case was submitted to the jury with instructions sufficiently favorable to the defendant. Miller v. Bannister, 109 Mass. 289. Cahill v Campbell, 105 Mass. 40. Exceptions overruled
117 Mass. 86
Mason v. Bowles
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 14, 1875
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1875-01-14
Replevin of a stock of goods, furniture and other articles, particularly described, in a shop and house numbered 11 on Merrimack Street, Lowell. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Bacon, J., it appeared that the plaintiff was a married woman, and the defendant, a deputy sheriff, attached and took the property replevied, by virtue of two writs against Daniel W. Mason, the plaintiff’s husband.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1940
2 state decisions
Relies on Cahill v. Campbell · Miller v. Bannister
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1875-01-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →