State Ex Rel. Ebert v. Loden’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
4 district · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2001 · most notably Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (1915), Dasch v. Jackson (1936)
4 district · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Barbier v. Connolly · Dent v. State of West Virginia · Powell v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Soon Hing v. Crowley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘"The act was to protect the people ot: Baltimore City against .the consequences resulting from the work of incompetent moving picture machine operators and was passed in the exercise ot' the police power of the state, and does nor, in our opinion, violate either the federal or state Constitution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.