Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 Mo. 379

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 27, 1893

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1893-06-27

— Hon. Joseph Cravens, Judge. The defendant should have been arraigned- after the withdrawal of his plea of not guilty, and overruling the demurrer. 'State v. Beeves, 97 Mo. 668. The record in this case fails to show that defendant was arraigned or entered a plea to the indictment at any time during either trial of this case. Under the repeated ruling of this court, this is essential, and the cause must be reversed and remanded.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1893-06-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1914

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

40189319001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gantt, P. J.

¶1— The indictment in this ease was returned by the grand jury of Lawrence county on the fourth day of February, 1891. The defendant was convicted at the October term, 1891. The bill of exceptions was filed January 19, 1892, and the clerk of the circuit court of Barry county, certified this record on the thirtieth day of January, 1892, and yet this transcript was not filed in this court for want of docket fee until May 2, 1893.

¶2There was no arraignment of defendant before he was put on trial, and, of course, this cause must be reversed, for that reason.

¶3It would seem that some method should be adopted to prevent a recurrence of this delay in a criminal case. The defendant should not be permitted to delay a public prosecution by simply neglecting to. pay the docket fee.

¶4A rule or this court recently adopted requires the clerks to promptly certify these appeals, or be held in contempt; but when they have done their duty, no reason can be given why the appeal in the present condition of this docket should not be speedily heard and determined.

¶5Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

All the judges of this division concur.
/117/mo/379 · .json · Public domain