Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 N.C. 13

23 S.E 37

Rodman v. Calloway

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1895

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1895-09-15

Civil aotioN, to recover land, tried before Boykin, J., and a jury, at February Term, 1895, of Beaufort Superior court, on the usual issues. There were various exceptions to the admission and rejection of evidence. The jury rendered a verdict that the plaintiffs were owners of the land excepting twenty-nine acres.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1908

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1895-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Faircloth, C. J.:

¶1The exceptions to the evidence were waived in this Court and the argument was made mainly on the division of the costs. Each party claimed .title to, and the plaintiff recovered a part of, the land. The jury failed to answer the issue as to the damages on a part of the land, which was left over by the court to be decided hereafter. In this fragmentary condition, we are not disposed to disturb the judgment on the question of costs.

¶2Judgment Affirmed.

/117/nc/13 · .json · Public domain