Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 NC 244 - Cobb v. Edwards

Cobb v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 1965
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1965

8 state decisions

3018951900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the judge is not at liberty to say that there is no evidence of the kind required by the rule of law prescribed in such cases, it is his duty to tell the jury that the law requires clear, strong and convincing proof to show the agreement, as well as the subsequent acts or admissions, and that it is their province to say whether that offered does so convince them of its truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.