¶1 The plaintiff sues for possession of land, making the usual allegations of title in herself and wrongful possession of the defendant. The answer denies these allegations and avers nothing more. On the trial the plaintiff showed title, and defendant offered to prove by a witness seven years possession under an unregistered and lost deed, and, by another, that she had a deed for the premises which was lost and had not been registered, which evidence was excluded. The offer of this evidence was an admission that defendant could not make out her title in a court of law, and that she had to invoke the aid of a court of equity, as the deed was lost and had not been reestablished under statutory provisions. In order to make such evidence competent, it was necessary for defendant to set up the facts in her answer as a defence in a court of equity, which was not done. This would also have been notice to the plaintiff. Tripless v. Witherspoon, 74 N. C., 475; Hinton v. Pritchard, 102 N. C., 94.
¶2 Affirmed.