Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 N.C. 808

23 S.E 455

State v. . Blankenship

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1895-09-05

INDICTMENT for forcible entry and detainer, tried at June' Term of the Criminal Court for Madison county, before Ewart, J., and a jury. The defendant was convicted and appealed.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1906

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1895-09-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Clark, J.:

¶1 -The defendant asked certain instructions which were not given. The refusal is deemed excepted to, but, if the exception is not set out by the appellant in stat *809 ing his case on appeal, it is waived. Taylor v. Plummer, 105 N. C., 56; Marshall v. Stine, 112 N. C., 697; Davis v. Duval, 112 N. C., 833. Indeed, no exception whatever appears to have been made, and, no error appearing upon the face of the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed. See numerous cases cited in Clark’s Code, p. 582, subhead, “Where no errors are assigned.”

¶2 Affirmed.

/117/nc/808 · .json · Public domain