Vandervoort v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dickinson v. Pake · Potts v. Burnette · 110 N.C. App. 28 - Freese v. Smith · Pittman v. FIRST PROTECTION LIFE INS. COMPANY · Hunt v. Wooten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o obtain a new trial based upon an error of the trial court in admitting evidence, the appellant must establish that: (1) he objected to the admission of the evidence at trial; (2) the evidence was inadmissible in law because it was incompetent, immaterial, or irrelevant; and (3) the evidence was prejudicial to appellant’s cause of action or defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.