117 N.C. App. 722 - Hatem v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2014
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 38 N.C. App. 50 - Ballenger v. Crowell · Little v. Rose · 99 N.C. App. 710 - Stallings v. Gunter · Setzer v. Baboff · 89 N.C. App. 250 - Callahan v. Rogers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the question of whether a cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations is a mixed question of law and fact. However, when the bar is properly, pleaded and the facts are admitted or are not in conflict, the question of whether the action is barred becomes one of law, and summary judgment is appropriate.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“suffered from sarcoidosis, a chronic disease process of unknown cause which may affect any organ or tissue of the body”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.