Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 NEB 168 - Schultz v. Strelow

Schultz v. Strelow’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 1958
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1958

16 state decisions

601928193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamilton v. Bayer · Fitzsimmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the 1909 will was bereft of its every intended usefulness, and by its own terms had finished its purpose, had lapsed, and was without force or effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that he as such legatee or devisee, under the law as well as under the will, is entitled to the legacy or devise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.