Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 Neb. 237

Dingle v. Gilbert

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1928

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1928-06-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1934

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1928-06-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The defenses tendered by the answer were, first, the statute of limitations; ■ second, that plaintiff did not procure a purchaser ready, able and willing to buy defendant’s land, and that no valid contract for the sale thereof was ever procured by defendant. At the conclusion of all the testimony, the trial court directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed, but in his brief he has totally ignored several provisions of rule 13 of this court. In his brief he fails to state the issues tried in the court below :and how they were decided, and there are no assignments of error in the brief.

¶2Because of plaintiff’s failure to comply with the rule of the court respecting the preparation of briefs, the judgment of the district court is

¶3Affirmed.

/117/neb/237 · .json · Public domain