Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Nev. 153 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Illinois v. Allen · Jones v. Barnes · McKaskle v. Wiggins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he majority of [s]tates honor a competent defendant's choice to forgo a defense strategy that asserts, in any way, that he or she was not guilty of the crime charged by reason of insanity-even over defense counsel's objections”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the record reflects that [the defendant] asserted his right to self-representation mainly because of the 'conflict of interests' arising out of his differences with his counsel over the insanity defense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.