Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 N.J.L. 560 - State v. Dolbow

State v. Dolbow’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
7
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably Jamouneau v. Harner (1954), State v. Miller (1978)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

12019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 54 Cal. App. 333 - People v. Peete · State v. James · Wilson v. McGuinness · Roesel v. State · State v. Compo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is only necessary to say that such statements were received with scrupulous care by the judge and with equal care limited in their effect as applicable only to the one making them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.