Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 NM 118 - Shaw v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Shaw v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

1 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably State v. Fekete (1995), State v. Walters (1996)

1 district · 25 state decisions

220199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farmers Insurance v. Burton · Griego v. Bag 'N Save Food Emporium · Eberline Instrument Corp. v. Felix · Salcido v. Transamerica Insurance Group · Justiz v. Walgreen's

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “B.the average weekly wage shall be determined by computing the total wages paid to the worker during the twenty-six weeks immediately preceding the date of injury and dividing by twenty-six, provided that: (1) if the worker worked less than twenty-six weeks in the employment in which the worker was injured, the average weekly wage shall be based upon the total wage earned by the worker in the employment in which the worker was injured, divided by the total number of weeks actually worked in that employment; C.provided, further, however, that in any case where the foregoing methods of computing the average weekly wage of the employee by reason of the nature of the employment or the fact that the injured employee has been ill or in business for himself or where for any other reason the methods will not fairly compute the average weekly wage, in each particular case, computation of the average weekly wage of the employee in such other manner and by such other method as will be based upon the facts presented fairly determine such employee’s average weekly wage[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.