Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 N.M. 241 - State v. Scussel

State v. Scussel’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gonzales · State v. Hernandez · Franco v. Federal Building Service, Inc. · Ledbetter v. Webb · Duncan v. Kerby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant argues that he should have been informed of all the consequences of his refusal to take a second test, and without such a warning, our holding is unfair. We disagree. We know of no requirement that a party must be informed of every possible consequence of an action before suffering the consequences of that action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.