Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 N.M. 315 - State v. Werner

State v. Werner’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
2
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 116 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. JAVIER M. (2001), State v. Flores (1996)

2 district · 116 state decisions

5401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Dunaway v. New York · United States v. Sharpe · Michigan v. Summers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Diligence in the investigation is key, and the expansion of the investigation to look, search, or fish elsewhere is not contemplated for investigatory stops. The concept of diligence has an aspect of speed or haste. As soon as the investigation requires awaiting the development of circumstances off the scene, the validity of the investigatory stop becomes suspect.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Snyder · 193 W. Va. 378 - State v. Jones
  2. “[A]ll reasonable inferences in support of the [district] court's decision will be indulged in, and all inferences or evidence to the contrary will be disregarded.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Jason L. · State v. Johnson
  3. “[a]n officer who makes a valid investigatory stop may briefly detain those he suspects of criminal activity to verify or quell that suspicion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00) · State v. Taylor

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.