Luboyeski v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
30 district · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably State v. Martinez (1998), Sonntag v. Shaw (2001)
30 district · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Hicks v. State · United Transportation Union v. Taylor · Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. Kapnison · Quintana v. New Mexico Department of Corrections · Smialek v. Begay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person aggrieved by an order of the commission may obtain a trial de novo in the district court of the county where the discriminatory practice occurred or where the respondent does business by filing a notice of appeal within ninety days from the date of service of the [New Mexico Human Rights] commission’s order.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whenever possible, we must read different legislative actions as harmonious instead of as contradicting one another.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hen a defendant is sued under the [New Mexico] Human Rights Act the plaintiff must exhaust her or his administrative remedies before bringing an action in district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.