State v. Danek’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2018
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. · Swafford v. State · Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc. · Maus v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing a [district] court's grant of a new trial, the appellate court must follow a two-step approach. First, this court must determine whether the grant of a new trial is based upon legal error. Second, this court must determine whether the error is substantial enough to warrant the exercise of the [district] court's discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Catt“The [district] court's decision will only be reversed upon a showing of clear and manifest abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Catt“know the relative weights the trial judge attached”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Griffin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.