Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 N.M. 508 - State v. Clifford

State v. Clifford’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably State v. Cunningham (2000), State v. Woodward (1995)

100 state decisions

480199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sutphin · Lee v. Lee · Matter of Adoption of Doe · State v. Orosco · State v. Osborne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “review issues raised in appellate briefs that are unsupported by cited authority. When a criminal conviction is being challenged, counsel should properly present [the reviewing] court with the issues, arguments, and proper authority. Mere reference in a conclusory statement will not suffice and is in violation of our rules of appellate procedure.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Barrera · Holt v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & Revenue
  2. “We reiterate our holding in [ State v.] Bunce [ 116 N.M. 284 , 861 P.2d 965 (1993) ] that the failure to include an essential element in the elements instruction can never be corrected by including the concept elsewhere in the instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Acosta
  3. “To be convicted under Section 30-42-4(A), [the d]efendants must have committed at least two punishable offenses that constitute racketeering.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Catt

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.