Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 N.M. 564 - McCurry v. McCurrSy

McCurry v. McCurrSy’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2017

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

70199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 81 Ill. 2d 317 - Finley v. Finley · 95 Wash. 2d 94 - Wagner v. Wagner · Spingola v. Spingola · Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque · City of New York v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a valid waiver requires a known legal right, relinquished for consideration, where such legal right is intended for the waivor's sole benefit and does not infringe on the rights of others. . . . In no case will a waiver be presumed or implied, contrary to the intention of the party whose rights would be injuriously affected thereby, unless, by his conduct, the opposite party has been misled, to his prejudice, into the honest belief that such waiver was intended or consented to. Absent proof of an express agreement, in order to establish waiver[,] there must be a showing of unequivocal acts or conduct on the part of the person against whom waiver is asserted showing an intent to waive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Waiver by acquiescence arises when a person knows he is entitled to enforce a right and neglects to do so for such a length of time that under the facts of the case the other party may fairly infer that he has waived or abandoned such right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.