In re Romero’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) Respondent shall reimburse Juan Carlos Bargeles, Larry Elkins, Scoti A. Bartlett, Barbara L. Vezzani, and Charles E. Mullin, III, in the amounts determined by the hearing committee to be owed to them on or before December 1, 1997, or, alternatively, make payment through the office of disciplinary counsel at the rate of $300 per month payable by the tenth day of each month with any unpaid balance bearing interest at the rate of fifteen per cent (15%) per annum; (2) Should any of the above-named persons seek and receive compensation from the Client Protection Fund of the amount(s) ordered to be paid to them, then respondent shall reimburse the fund in lieu of payment to the client; (3) Respondent shall make this restitution as a condition of his probation and for the protection of the public and that any wilful non-payment, such as discharging these obligations in any bankruptcy proceeding, shall give rise to proceedings wherein his probation could be revoked and further discipline imposed; (4) Respondent shall commit no violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct during his probationary period; Respondent shall promptly and thoroughly respond to any inquiries from the office of disciplinary counsel regarding any allegations of misconduct filed against him; and (5) (6) Respondent shall reimburse the disciplinary board its costs in bringing this action in the amount of $459.25 on or before December 1, 1997, and any unpaid balance after that date shall bear interest of fi”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Barrera