Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Ohio App. 233 - Hoffman v. Vetter

117 Ohio App. 233 - Hoffman v. Vetter’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When Wallace G. Vetter had his name placed on the ledger sheet, he in effect withdrew the then joint account, and made such account an individual bank account." Id. at 235 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"In our consideration of the claim of Louise Vetter, with respect to the bank savings account, we find that, when the account was established, Louise Vetter signed a blank card giving to the bank a copy of her signature; there was no formal joint account contract signed. The account then was designated on the ledger card as `Mr. or Mrs. W.G. Vetter.' There was no withdrawal of this signature card; but after the divorce was granted, the account was changed on the ledger card at the request of Mr. Vetter to `Wallace G. Vetter.' When Mr. Vetter remarried, the ledger card was again changed at the request of Mr. Vetter to `Wallace G. Vetter or Mrs. Wallace G. Vetter or the survivor.' In no instance was there a formal agreement executed between the bank and the parties. The only indication that such an arrangement had been made is obtained from the typed names on the ledger card. Either party could have requested the bank to make a change in the account, and it would have been granted. The requirement that a copy of the signature be given to the bank was for the protection of the bank, not the parties to the contract." 117 Ohio App. at 234-35 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the only Mrs. Wallace G. Vetter at that time was the second wife. It observed, as quoted by the Court of Special Appeals:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.