Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Powers

117 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2021

14 state decisions

801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · 37 Ohio App. 3d 68 - City of Columbus v. Hodge · City of Toledo v. Reasonover · 16 Ohio St. 2d 16 - Henry v. Central National Bank · 56 Ohio App. 2d 223 - Bates & Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although there appears to be a dearth of case law interpreting these statutes, we find that the legislature intended that costs of prosecution, including jury fees, can be assessed against a defendant only if the state is successful.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 216 W. Va. 120 - State v. Myers · State v. Lykins
  2. “[i]n all criminal cases, * * * the judge * * * shall include in the sentence the costs of prosecution * * * and render a judgment against the defendant for such costs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. City of Middleburg Hts. v. Quinones, 88242 (7-19-2007) · State v. Lykins
  3. “[T]he meaning of word 'sentence' in the context of a criminal case is '[t]he judgment formally pronounced by the court or judge upon the defendant after his conviction in a criminal prosecution.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Lykins

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.