Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Ohio App. 3d 262 - Spears v. Smith

117 Ohio App. 3d 262 - Spears v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2013

9 state decisions

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simons v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance · Simons v. Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(5) That particular part of real property on which you or any contractor or subcontractor working directly or indirectly on your behalf is performing operations, if the property damage arises out of those operations.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Erie Ins. Exchange v. Colony Dev. Corp., Unpublished Decision (12-31-2003) · Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
  2. “'property damage' occurring away from premises you own or rent and arising out of `your product' or `your work' except: (1) Products that are still in your physical possession; or (2) Work that has not yet been completed or abandoned.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Erie Ins. Exchange v. Colony Dev. Corp., Unpublished Decision (12-31-2003) · Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
  3. “the phrase `are performing operations' [in exclusion j(5)] is written in the present tense.... Thus, in unambiguous terms, exclusion 2 (j)(5) bars coverage only for damage involving `works in progress.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. · Interstate Properties v. Prasanna, Inc., Unpublished Decision (5-31-2006)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.