Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Ohio App. 3d 617 - Liming v. Liming

117 Ohio App. 3d 617 - Liming v. Liming’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · In re Jane Doe 1 · Berk v. Matthews · Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. Partnership · Masters v. Masters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has typically been relegated to the sound discretion of the trial court and would not be overturned absent an abuse of that discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is settled law that attorney fees can only be awarded in fraud cases where punitive, or exemplary damages would be appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.