Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Ohio App. 3d 86 - State v. Patton

117 Ohio App. 3d 86 - State v. Patton’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State ex rel. Jones v. Court of Common Pleas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t would be a mockery of justice to allow a defendant who has sought and obtained a stay of execution of his sentence in order to appeal to avoid incarceration because he failed to surrender himself to authorities after his conviction and sentence were affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While an inordinate delay between imposition of a sentence and its execution may demonstrate a failure of due process, * * * each case must be considered in the light of its particular circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (2) to minimize anxiety of the accused (not the convicted); and (3) to limit the possibility that the defense will be impaired”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.