Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 OHIOST3D 1237 - State v. Noe

State v. Noe’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. Goodwill Industries of Akron, Inc. · Silverberg v. Silverberg · Buckingham Coal Co. v. Santo · Sangster v. Dunn · In re Disqualification of Krueger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We elect judges in Ohio, and we must ordinarily assume that an attorney's or a party's vocal opposition to the election of a judge will not cause that judge to harbor bias when the attorney or the party later appears before the judge”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.